Linear solids and vibration · VNV-TET10-CALCULIX-C3D10-014
TET10 torsion field correlation with CalculiX
QF Solver and CalculiX 2.20 use the same curved C3D10 connectivity, coordinates, supports and nodal loads.
Internal review accepted with recommendationsCampaign version 0.2.0
Recorded values
Main observables and references
Values come from the linked campaign record. Acceptance thresholds are shown separately from observed results.
Model and execution
What was calculated?
- The model uses 1,063 quadratic tetrahedra and 1,992 nodes.
- The circular shaft has the same geometry, connectivity, coordinates, restraints and loads in both solvers.
- The figure shows CalculiX deformation for the torsion model.
How to read the evidence
What the results say
- The relative difference is 6.84 × 10⁻⁵ for the full displacement field and 6.45 × 10⁻⁵ for terminal twist.
- Stress correlation was not part of this comparison.
Scope boundary
Where this case stops
- This is a same-mesh comparison for one linear elastic torsion case.
- It does not establish stress agreement or transfer to other meshes, materials or analysis routes.
Open the calculation method
These white box sheets explain the element, constitutive law or numerical method used by this case.
Reproduce and inspect the source
The source paths below are pinned to one repository commit. Opening the current site does not rerun the original calculation.
Mechanical review
docs/verification/revue_tet10_lineaire.md↗Reproduction scriptscripts/run_calculix_tet10_vnv.py↗Figure and source snapshot e367fe58b2b9ebb4aef321424ca775e80e82d9ca. Campaign execution version: 0.2.0. Current site release and original calculation version identify different events.
Related cases
Other recorded calculations in this family.